• gnway2mining@gmail.com
News Photo

Mines Act vs OSH Code β€” Sanitation Facilities βš–οΈ

βš–οΈ Mines Act vs OSH Code β€” Sanitation Facilities

βš–οΈ Mines Act vs OSH Code β€” Sanitation Facilities

Simple comparison🚧

πŸ“˜ Quick Summary

The 1952 Act mandated separate toilets for males and females. The new OSH Code 2020 updates this by explicitly adding transgender employees to the list, ensuring inclusivity and better hygiene standards.

πŸ“œ Old Law – Mines Act 1952 (Sec 20)

  • Separation: Must provide separate latrines/urinals for Males and Females.
  • Standards: Must be convenient, accessible, adequately lighted, ventilated, and clean.
  • Numbers: Central Govt specifies the proportion based on the number of employees.

πŸ“— New Law – OSH Code 2020 (Sec 23)

  • Separation: Must provide sufficient arrangement for Male, Female, and Transgender employees separately.
  • Standards: Must maintain hygiene therein.
  • Authority: The specific rules will likely detail the scale/ratio (to be prescribed).

πŸ“Š Side-by-Side Comparison

Aspect Mines Act 1952 OSH Code 2020
Target Group Male & Female only Male, Female & Transgender
Key Requirement "Convenient and accessible" "Sufficient arrangement"
Condition Lighted, ventilated, sanitary Maintain hygiene
Section Ref Section 20 Section 23(2)(viii)

πŸ” What Changed & Why It Matters

The addition of "Transgender" is a significant move towards social inclusion in the mining sector. Previously, the law was binary (Male/Female). Now, mine managers must ensure infrastructure planning includes distinct facilities for transgender staff to comply with the OSH Code.

Share This News

Comment

Any Support ?